On Volume 129 of the Journal, I talked with conductor Peter Phillips about an album of music by Arvo Pärt recorded by the Tallis Scholars. The album was titled Tintinnabuli, in recognition of the technique of composition that Pärt developed. Musicologist Leopold Brauneiss discussed that technique in an essay titled “Musical archetypes: the basic elements of the titinnabuli style.”

“It could be said that, like the music of Haydn, Pärt’s music is appreciated all over the world. One reason for this rather rare phenomenon for a contemporary composer is that he found ways of (re)building the music out of very simple basic elements or patterns such as scales, which are commonly recognized. I suggest characterizing these elements or patterns as ‘archetypes’: this multilayered Greek term can literally be translated as ‘original or primal image’ (arche = beginning, source). In the twentieth century, it has been known primarily through its use in Carl Jung’s analytical psychology, where it is linked with the equally important concept of the collective unconscious. For Jung, this means a deep layer of the unconscious mind, which can be called collective inasmuch as it is ‘not a personal acquisition but is inborn’ and thus ‘not individual but universal.’ Jung calls the contents of this collective unconscious ‘archetypes.’ These ‘contents and modes of behavior that are more or less the same everywhere and in all individuals’ are by no means to be perceived as concrete images or ideas: in Jung’s understanding, the archetypes are rather ‘definite forms in the psyche which seem to be present always and everywhere.’ Elsewhere, Jung also strongly emphasizes that:

archetypes are not determined as regards their content, but only as regards their form and then only to a very limited degree. A primordial image is determined as to its content only when it has become conscious and is therefore filled out with the material of conscious experience. Its form, however, as I have explained elsewhere, might perhaps be compared to the axial system of a crystal, which, as it were, performs the crystalline structure in the mother liquid, although it has no material existence of its own. . . . The archetype in itself is empty and purely formal, nothing but a facultas performandi, a possibility of representation which is given a priori. The representations themselves are not inherited, only the forms, and in that respect they correspond in every way to the instincts, which are also determined in form only.

“The idea of the human soul possessing a ‘net-like basic pattern,’ which Arvo Pärt put forward in his acceptance speech for the Internationaler Brückepreis der Europastadt Görlitz (International Bridge Prize of the European City of Görlitz), is not too far removed from Jung’s image of a crystalline system of coordinates. Pärt’s point of origin is the empirical fact that diverse items and substances have very similar basic patterns when examined through a powerful microscope. If one were to imagine that the human soul could also be examined through a microscope lens, it could be expected that — at a certain degree of magnification — a comparable ‘net-like basic pattern’ would be detected. In his Görlitz speech Pärt notes:

Perhaps one might call it ‘human geometry,’ neatly sorted, quietly formed — but, most of all, beautiful. In this depth, we are all so similar that we could recognize ourselves in any other person. . . . I am very much tempted to see this beautiful and neat Ur-substance, this precious island in the inner seclusion of our soul, as the ‘place’ where, over 2000 years ago, we were told that the Kingdom of God would be — inside us. No matter if we are old or young, rich or poor, woman or man, colored or white, talented or less talented. And so, I keep trying to stay on the path that searches for this passionately longed-for ‘magic island,’ where all people (and for me, all sounds) can live together in love.

“Just as we strive to treat our fellow people with love and care in daily life, the composer aims at creating a world in which all sounds, despite their superficial differences, are connected with love. The parenthesis in the last sentence ‘and for me, all sounds’ shows how we are to picture the connection between life and art in the tintinnabuli style: the same ideals apply to the composer’s handling of sounds and musical figures and in our relationships with the living environment. Hence, the goal in music is to advance to the deeper layers of primal pictures and substances which could be identified as musical archetypes. Like the mental archetypes in Jung’s analytical psychology, they have to be general, supra-individual, and preexistent. The quest for the ‘magic island’ in universal human existence, which is also the place of encounter with the divine, corresponds, in music, to the quest for the universally musical: in both, the common and connective elements do not arise from a complex variety of interwoven heterogeneous elements but through the fact that outward individual differences can be reduced to homogeneous and simple basic patterns which thus can be more readily overcome.

“As with Jung’s psychic archetypes, musical archetypes are fundamentally empty forms with no contents. They only appear and become analytically graspable when musical material ‘crystallizes.’ In the tintinnabuli style, the regular crystalline structure corresponds to basic formal relationships such as mirroring, parallel motion, additions, and multiplications, all of which determine the musical processes on small and large levels. On the one hand, it is possible to explain these processes in numbers; on the other hand, they can also be illustrated graphically. The general archetypical element not only connects all tones in music; it also joins music as a whole with both the numerical world of mathematics and physical processes, as well as with the visible world of geometry and visual representation in general.”

— from Leopold Brauneiss, “Musical archetypes: the basic elements of the titinnabuli style,” in
Andrew Shenton, ed.,The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

Related reading and listening