arrow-right cart chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up close menu minus play plus search share user email pinterest facebook instagram snapchat tumblr twitter vimeo youtube subscribe dogecoin dwolla forbrugsforeningen litecoin amazon_payments american_express bitcoin cirrus discover fancy interac jcb master paypal stripe visa diners_club dankort maestro trash

Shopping Cart

((released 2006-09-19) (handle arp-3-m) (supplement ))
Globalization: Ancient and Modern
Regular price

Globalization: Ancient and Modern

Unit price per

Beginning with the refreshing observation of the sheer ugliness of the  word globalization” (an adjective, converted into a barbaric verb, then forced into service as a still more barbaric noun), Joshua Hochschild observes that this misbegotten word labels a poorly defined concept. Despite its vagueness, it suggests a trend toward increased economic and political interdependence, which at once fosters and is fostered by cultural homogenization.” Hochschild goes on to examine the effects of this trend on local communities and insists that any effort to evaluate globalization requires a return to a political teleology,” reflection on the ends of politics given the ends of human being.

This article was originally published in The Intercollegiate Review, Spring 2006. Read by Ken Myers. 36 Minutes.